Science learning outside the classroom is undervalued, new report finds
30 November 2012
The research on informal science learning also highlights that despite a commitment from providers to reach all parts of society, disadvantaged groups still do not have equal access to informal science learning opportunities.
While schools help students develop formalised understanding of general principles, experiences outside the classroom are essential to give meaning, relevance and context to the ideas that schools offer. They often provide a moment of emotional contact, where it is possible to have a hands-on experience, be challenged or provoked, or simply to enjoy the moment.
For example, in school students will learn about the theory of evolution, but a visit to the Natural History Museum will enable them to see how the natural world and the human race have evolved, bringing the theory and principles to life.
Although many educators recognise the importance of informal learning, few are familiar with the supporting evidence. Previous research has shown the positive impact on student attainment of learning experiences outside school during the summer break, and a 2006 study by the Programme for International Student Assessment shows that school extracurricular activities relate to better performance, enjoyment and more positive attitudes to science.
Young people spend less than one-fifth (18 per cent) of their waking hours in school, even when in full-time education; there is a lot of time available for influencing their learning outside the formal system.
Research commissioned by the Wellcome Trust in summer 2011, and conducted by UK-based GHK Consulting and by Stanford and Oregon State Universities, sought to characterise the value of informal science learning to science education in the UK. In particular, the reports aimed to explore its scope, the types of change it can bring, how it can be evaluated and how it relates to other parts of the education system.
The research found that practitioners of informal science believe passionately in the importance of science as part of our culture and want to convey this to others, but - although some teachers also appreciate the enriching experiences it can provide - schools often fail to take advantage of the opportunities on offer beyond the classroom walls.
In particular, access to informal learning is not equal across all demographics. Lower socioeconomic groups, rural communities, under-5s and adults are under-served. If informal science learning is to be a key component of an effective science education, this would mean these under-served groups are placed at an educational and long-term economic disadvantage.
Clare Matterson, Director of Medical Humanities and Engagement at the Wellcome Trust, commented: "There is much to reflect on in these reports. How can we make it easier for schools to take advantage of informal science learning experiences, and in particular how can gaps in provision be addressed so that children from disadvantaged backgrounds don't miss out?
"This research will be valuable in helping us reflect on our own activity, and likewise we hope that schools and the government will take steps to ensure that the value of any interaction with the informal sector is maximised."
Sir John Holman, Senior Fellow for Education at the Wellcome Trust, concluded: "We are convinced that informal science can engage and interest people in ways that formal settings cannot. But we need greater collaboration between the informal and formal learning sectors, so that young people get a better all-round experience of science: interest sparked outside school needs to be sustained within it."
Over the past ten years, the Wellcome Trust has spent more than £50 million supporting projects to deliver performances, exhibitions, debates, games, broadcasts and other activities to help the learning of science, as well as developing its own venue, Wellcome Collection.
The two reports are published on the Wellcome Trust's website today, along with a short commentary responding to the reports from the perspective of the Wellcome Trust. The Trust will be hosting a closed event on Tuesday 4 December with key stakeholders from informal learning to discuss key outcomes and how to take the findings forward.
Image: Children doing creative activities at a museum. Credit: Libby Welch, Wellcome Images.
Media Relations Manager
T +44 (0)20 7611 7329
Notes for editors
Commentary: Responds to the reports from the perspective of the Wellcome Trust. Holman J and Matterson C, November 2012.
Report: Analysing the UK Science Education Community: The contribution of informal providers. Stanford and Oregon State Universities, November 2012.
Report: Review of Informal Science Learning. GHK Consulting in association with Brand Driver and Red Kite Advice and Consulting, November 2012.
The reports are available on the Wellcome Trust website.
About the Wellcome Trust
The Wellcome Trust is a global charitable foundation dedicated to achieving extraordinary improvements in human and animal health. It supports the brightest minds in biomedical research and the medical humanities. The Trust's breadth of support includes public engagement, education and the application of research to improve health. It is independent of both political and commercial interests.
About the reports
In summer 2011 the Wellcome Trust commissioned two reports on informal science learning in the UK - that is, the learning of science in informal settings outside school.
The work reported here is based on in-depth qualitative interviews with 55 stakeholders and broadcasters with an interest in informal science learning; an internet-based survey of informal science learning providers for which 196 responses were obtained; a reduced form of the same survey with schools for which 23 responses were obtained; ten in-depth case studies with informal science learning providers featuring visits and qualitative interviews; 12 family studies comprising in-depth interviews with children and young people, supplemented by diary keeping, and interviews with parents; a systematic review of the academic literature; reviews of the existing 'grey literature' and analysis of data from the Wellcome Trust Monitor and Public Attitudes to Science Survey; and feedback from a symposium hosted by the Wellcome Trust.