We use cookies on this website. By continuing to use this site without changing your cookie settings, you agree that you are happy to accept our cookies and for us to access these on your device. Find out more about how we use cookies and how to change your cookie settings.

Tibbs and the precautionary principle

Nan O's cat, Tibbs, is poorly. Could her new 'FelineFine' supplement be to blame? Should Nan O follow the precautionary principle and stop using it, just in case?

When a course of action might have a potentially serious impact, one approach is to adopt the precautionary principle. Rather than assuming something is safe until proven otherwise, the precautionary principle argues the opposite – that something should be considered potentially harmful unless shown to be safe.

While the precautionary principle aims to protect us against possible dangers, an excessively 'safety-first' approach may have its own drawbacks. For example, we may lose the benefits that a new technology might provide.

With Tibbs the cat, doubts about the safety of FelineFine may persuade us to stop using it. That may stop Tibbs being poisoned, but it might harm her in other ways.

Share |
Home  >  Education resources  >  Education and learning  >  Big Picture  >  All issues  >  Nanoscience  >  Articles  > Tibbs and the precautionary principle
Wellcome Trust, Gibbs Building, 215 Euston Road, London NW1 2BE, UK T:+44 (0)20 7611 8888